Review: Misery

Misery by Stephen King

I consider Misery to be my first real Stephen King, although I’ve read both The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon and On Writing. However, I read the former when I was too little to actually analyze and appreciate literature and the latter is a memoir crossed with advice on writing. While I’m pathetically squeamish, Misery attracted me because it deals with a fan’s love for a work that becomes twisted and obsessive. As my time with my local library came to a close (aw, isn’t that sad?), I sucked it up and picked up Misery.

Misery starts with a car crash. Paul Sheldon, a writer beloved for the Misery historical romances he writes to fund his “real” writing, gets into an accident while driving to deliver the manuscript of his latest book. His legs shattered, he is rescued by Annie Wilkes, a former nurse who describes herself as his number one fan. Although she nurses him back to health, she turns on him when she learns of Misery’s death in Paul’s recently published Misery’s Child. Annie forces Paul to burn his latest manuscript and write a new Misery novel, just for her, in which Misery is restored to life. As Annie grows more and more unhinged and Paul learns of her murderous past, Paul is forced to play Scheherazade in order to survive. But he can’t keep it up forever…

King’s reputation as a great writer is, obviously, an earned one, and it clearly shows in Misery. Although I’m not a fan of the stream of consciousness portions that bookend the novel, his writing is great–there are moments of great wonder (Paul fondly looks back on the prelude to starting a novel as a sort of intellectual pregnancy) and moments of great horror (my right ankle itched for an hour after a particularly horrifying scene). King uses short chapters and long periods of Annie’s absence to masterfully crank up the paranoia and oppressive atmosphere. As Paul spends most of the novel trapped in Annie’s guest room, it deals mostly with psychological horror–deprived of his usual vices and addicted to Novril, one of Annie’s ill-gotten painkillers, Paul is stripped down to the bare essence of himself, pondering his co-dependent relationship with Annie as well as the writing process. Having read King’s On Writing, there appears to be a lot of King in Paul. While I do find Paul’s characterization of writing as selfish as a little cynical, it’s certainly true at some level. I was quite impressed during the few excerpts of Misery’s Return, which were exactly as advertised–frivolous but addicting. Making another style work (although, admittedly, Misery’s Return is explicitly more Gothic than Paul’s other work) as well as your own can be difficult, and King succeeds wonderfully.

As Paul has a lot of King in him and he’s the point of view character, he’s wonderfully developed. I especially enjoyed his vivid imagination (which, naturally, helps the tension and paranoia along nicely) and how his captivity and torture helps him look at himself as a writer. While he’s always aspired to be a writer of mainstream literary fiction, he reflects on the difference between a “popular” writer and a “literary” writer and even starts to look at Misery, a character he despises, differently. Annie’s development comes at a slower pace, but watching her unravel is scary–and watching Paul, who knows a little about psychopaths due to novel research, predict her unraveling is even scarier. Her rationalizations for her behavior, and her insistence on how much she loves Paul even as she tortures him, are interesting and almost understandable–I say almost, because Annie is, at the heart of things, a monster. But she’s not a wholly intentional monster; at one point, Paul wonders what her life would have been like if she’d been brought up a different way or if her hormones were like that of a regular person. While she is, of course, our villain, she’s also a well-developed character, which makes the book work.

I have to admit, I’m squeamish when it comes to horror and gore. But Misery is worlds away from anything like Saw–the point is not the shock of the twisted gore we see; it’s the shock of the twisted motivations and twisted people we see. At one point, Paul recalls one of his other “number one” fans, a woman who obsessively recreated Misery’s study from the books, and thinks that both her harmless obsession and Annie’s murderous one come from the same place. Annie, in other words, could easily be someone like you. That’s more chilling than any imaginative piece of gore. I was, I have to admit, looking forward to a bit more discussion of the relationship between authors and their fans, but I think that’s simply because of the time period–fandom, obviously, was nowhere near as active in 1987 as it is now, and it usually gathers around speculative works, not historical fiction. In fact, I think it would be interesting to see something like Misery set today, considering the evolution of fan communities. But that’s a thought for another time.

Bottom line: Misery is a masterful piece of work by Stephen King–the tension makes you sweat, there’s beauty and paranoia in the writing, and our hero and our villain are equally well-developed. And on top of it all, King reveals he can write frivolously addicting historical fiction just as well as his usual fare. A great introduction to King.

I rented this book from the public library.

18 thoughts on “Review: Misery

  1. It’s sad when I am too much of a wuss to read scary books. I know they might be good but I just can’t face it. I am already paranoid and anxious enough. But I swear I’m going to read Stephen King soon.

    • Jenny, I didn’t find The Talisman all that scary. It’s more of a fantasy, and it’s suspenseful, but it’s mostly fantasy suspense. (It’s also one of my favorite King books.) And The Eye of the Dragon is, as best I can remember, not a bit scary. It’s also fantasy and I believe King said he wrote it as something his kids could read. (Of course, now one of said kids is writing ridiculously scary stuff.)

  2. While I do find Paul’s characterization of writing as selfish as a little cynical, it’s certainly true at some level.

    And keeping in mind that Stephen King himself is an author who would be recognized by sight–I’d say any fault of Paul is pretty much forgivable! But I agree completely that he and Annie are fully developed humans, both.

    I have such a morbid love for this book. I’ve had it ever since I found it at a library book sale while I was in junior high (the edition where Stephen King’s face is painted on a typical bulky, Fabbio-esque romantic hero just inside the cover, which is hilarious). Misery shows a lot of what makes King so great: tension, paranoia, taking old things (Scheherazade) and making them new.

    Ack, you have me wanting to re-read this one, it’s been a few years!

  3. I’ve never read Misery, though I have read many of his other novels and am a huge fan of his earlier work. My very first King novel was “The Tommyknockers,” but “The Stand” is one of my top 5 all-time favorites.

  4. I read a lot of King in high school but skipped him for years. About two years ago, I picked up Duma Key and was reminded of how good a writer he can be. He can definitely scare you and leaves you thinking about the character’s actions days after but sometimes I also feel like he drones on a bit seeing how much he can get out of a creepy situation. I like horror books (I also have a very soft spot for bad movies, Saw excluded. Don’t care for gore.) so things like this always appeal to me. I don’t remember reading Misery but Carrie, The Stand, and The Long Walk (published under the name of Richard Bachman) are favorites of mine.

    • Are the Richard Bachman Kings more horror or less horror? For some reason, I think he used a different pen name simply to differentiate them.

      I think the balance between going on and on and racketing up the tension is done very well in Misery.

  5. I used to read King all the time, and I definitely remember enjoying Misery; although since that time, my memories have been slightly skewed by the movie. I hope you continue reading King – The Tommyknockers is freaking awesome!

  6. This is sitting almost at the very top of my TBR pile. I love Stephen King, but haven’t gotten round to this one yet. He really is a talented writer and willing to try new things. I had no idea until reading your review how much experimenting he did with this book!

    You saw my recs to Jenny for non-scary Kings. I’ve read plenty of others and none have been total duds, but a few are overlong; he’ll have a great setup that fizzles out as if he doesn’t know what to do with the story. But there’s lots that’s just terrific if you’re looking for suggestions. (Jenny over at my blog was the one who got me into King and she’s read almost everything he’s written if you want more ideas!)

    • And I should add that his what might be his longest book (the unabridged version of The Stand) is not one of the overlong ones! I was thinking specifically of Cell and From a Buick Eight. It just depends on the story. He spun the Dark Tower saga into 7 novels (which I *adore*) and only toward the end were there signs of bloat, but then I didn’t care because I adored the characters so much.

  7. “Annie, in other words, could easily be someone like you. That’s more chilling than any imaginative piece of gore. ”

    Yes. That’s I find stories that make you realise that people who do horrible things are in fact human beings and not as different from us as we’d like to think both scarier and more satisfying than anything else.

    The fact that I’ve yet to read anything at all by King makes me feel like a bad fan of speculative fiction 😛 Thank you for reminding me that I need to change that.

  8. I read this many years ago… a few weeks before I had knee surgery for the first time. Not the best decision I ever made, and now the only memory association I have with this book is the horror about damage to the joints and being unable to walk.

  9. This is one of my all-time favorite Stephen King books. I have heard that “The Shining” by Stephen King is even better, but I am holding off on reading that for now. Want to really earn the pleasure 🙂

    Nice blog, discovered it while browsing through the BBAW Treasure recommendations

Your Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s