Review: Banewreaker

Banewreaker by Jacqueline Carey

I first heard of Jacqueline Carey when Naamah’s Curse was released this summer; while it sounded interesting, it also sounded like romance with a fantasy twist, rather than the other way around. But I perked up when Brandon Sanderson recommended her series The Sundering in an essay on postmodern fantasy. Once I discovered it was a deconstruction of The Lord of the Rings, I had to read it. I have to space out reading deconstructions, because they can be so dark and cynical, but I have a bit of a mania for deconstructive fantasy. I hoped Banewreaker would hit the spot.

It blew me away.

Banewreaker takes place on the world of Urulat, a world populated by Ellylon, Men, Dwarfs, Weres, Fjeltrolls–and gods. Satoris Third-Born was once one of the divine Seven Shapers, headed by Haomane First-Born, but Satoris refused to bow to his brother’s will and remove desire, his divine Gift, from Men’s hearts. The war that ensued Sundered the world, leaving the Six Shapers on the now mystical island of Torath and Satoris in Urulat, with the other mortal races–who believe that the Sundering is all Satoris’ fault and curse his name. When he impending marriage of a Ellylon noblewoman to a Man threatens to fulfill a prophecy that speaks of the end of Satoris, the Shaper sends his Commander General, Tanaros Blacksword, to kidnap the noblewoman Cerelinde to prevent the marriage. But Haomane wants war, and even the plans of gods can go awry.

As I’ve mentioned before, a good deconstruction needs to mimic the conditions of the work it’s deconstructing; this is something quite different than being simply derivative, à la Eragon. When it comes to what Banewreaker has taken from The Lord of the Rings, we have an evil that fell from grace (even the epithet of the book is taken from Paradise Lost), similar races (the Ellylon are essentially elves), a Company, and a similar plot. But Carey just doesn’t make this original by placing the camera in a different location; things are deeper and more complex here. Much like A Song of Ice and Fire, there is no ultimate good or ultimate evil; everyone truly believes in what they believe in. The hilariously named Carfax (I’m sure the etymology is sound, but still!) is a perfect illustration; a footman in Satoris’ army, he finds himself a captive of the Company, where he encounters beliefs he’s never thought about and learns to doubt. And this complexity isn’t limited solely to the characters; even the worldbuilding gets it. A patronizing view towards other races is rendered by making literal the Renaissance theory that people had dark skin because they were burnt by the sun–a nice take on the Anglo-Saxon foundations of Middle-earth.

Banewreaker is definitely epic sweeping fantasy; it opens with a prologue about the Sundering, and the language feels downright chivalric. Personally, reading it felt like coming home, since fantasy is my genre, although I could see how it might throw people used to snappier prose for a loop. But the pace never drags; I actually put the book down one night, intending to sleep–only to find the light back on and the book back in my lap. I really wish I could go into each character in-depth and tell you why I liked them–how Tanaros will never escape the fact he murdered his wife and king, Ushashin’s mother issues, Cerelinde slowly realizing the world isn’t black and white… but I can’t pick favorites. I liked them all, on either side. It certainly makes for thrilling battles, when you don’t know which side you want to cheer on.

Banewreaker is part of a duet, so it’s half of a complete story. I’ve railed against several books that do this, as I think it’s lazy and downright mean to crack a plot in half. But Banewreaker proves it can be done properly. Carey has worked out the proper plot structure to do such a thing. Banewreaker’s climax is the siege of Beshtanag, a wild, dark battle that has harsh consequences for both sides. The novel continues afterwards in order to set up things for the next part, but there’s a sense of motion as the forces of Darkhaven collect themselves and Cerelinde begins to doubt her devotion to the side of “good”. It reminded me a little of the film adaptation of The Two Towers, which successfully turned a third of a novel into a complete film; a sense of completion, but a sense of things to come. You’re definitely going to want to pick up Godslayer immediately, but you don’t feel cheated by Banewreaker. (Of course, now that I know it can be done properly, I will only rail louder against books that don’t.)

Bottom line: How can I put this? Read it. Carey populates a thoughtful deconstruction of The Lord of the Rings with characters so complex and human that you don’t know which side you want to win. I was utterly blown away, and I hope you will be too.

I rented this book from the public library.

28 thoughts on “Review: Banewreaker

  1. This sounds so good! I’d put it on hold at my library right now, but I’m already at my holds limit (*pout*). Still, as soon as I have space I want this!

  2. This sounds interesting. I’ve lately become a tiny bit cynical about The Lord of the Rings, largely because I’ve become cynical about ye olde “White Old Guys” that tend to dominate the genre. Maybe this will restore my faith in high fantasy!

  3. I’m so glad you’ve finished and reviewed this, because what you’d written before about it sounded fantastic. Your review definitely makes me want to grab Banewreaker NOW! It actually sounds more like it’s based on The Silmarillion than The Lord of the Rings (Satoris being equivalent to Melkor rather than Sauron), but perhaps the second book plays with the LOTR idea a bit more.

    Am now off to Amazon to buy it…

    • I talk about that a little more in my review of Godslayer, which is coming up next week; but there’s definite parallels to The Lord of the Rings–a chosen one who must bring a magical artifact to the very door of evil to stop him, complete with their own Gandalf and company.

      I really hope you enjoy it! It’s amazing.

      • Thank-you so much for introducing me to ‘Banewreaker’ – I finished it last night and have started ‘Godslayer’. I’ll post a review some time soon, but I really, really enjoyed it – Carey makes you care about all of her characters.

        I do see what you mean about the Lord of the Rings parallels, though, now having read the book.

  4. I’m not always a huge fantasy reader, but I am adding this one to my list because you said it’s so good! I’m also recommending it to my husband, who reads a lot of fantasy. If one of us gets to it soon, I’ll let you know how it goes :-)

  5. Pingback: New entries in the to be read pile « Ela's Book Blog

  6. Pingback: Review: Godslayer « The Literary Omnivore

  7. Pingback: Library Loot: December 15th to 21st « A Striped Armchair

  8. Pingback: The Sunday Salon: 2010 in Review « The Literary Omnivore

  9. Pingback: February 2011 Wrap-Up: Books and Reviews « Fyrefly's Book Blog

  10. Pingback: Monthly Wrap-Up: June 2011 Books and Reviews « Fyrefly's Book Blog

  11. Pingback: The Sunday Salon: My Second Blogiversary « The Literary Omnivore

  12. Pingback: Jacqueline Carey – Banewreaker « Fyrefly's Book Blog

  13. Pingback: Jacqueline Carey – Godslayer « Fyrefly's Book Blog

  14. Pingback: The Sunday Salon: Reading in Public « The Literary Omnivore

  15. Pingback: Book Blogger Appreciation Week: Underappreciated « The Literary Omnivore

  16. Pingback: The Sunday Salon: Bookish Questions « The Literary Omnivore

Your Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s